Chad Ford
Close Chad Ford
ESPN Senior Writer Senior NBA Writer for ESPN.com ESPN Insider NBA Draft Analyst since 2002
Writes ESPN's NBA Draft Top 100 and Lottery Mock Draft
and Kevin Pelton
Close Kevin Pelton
ESPN Senior Writer Co-author, Pro Basketball Prospectus series
Formerly a consultant with the Indiana Pacers
Developed WARP rating and SCHOENE system
Multiple Authors
May 25, 2016, 10:00 AM ET So you're wondering how we put the NBA Future Power Rankings together ? Here's how we did it.
FUTURE POWER RATING PLAYERS (worth 58.3% of score): Current players and their potential for the future, factoring in expected departures
MANAGEMENT (worth 16.7% of score): Quality and stability of front office, ownership, coaching
MONEY (worth 8.3% of score): Projected salary-cap situation; ability and willingness to exceed cap and pay luxury tax
MARKET (worth 8.3% of score): Appeal to future acquisitions based on team quality, franchise reputation, city's desirability as a destination, market size, taxes, business and entertainment opportunities, arena quality, fans
DRAFT (worth 8.3% of score): Future draft picks; draft positioning
To determine the Future Power Rating, we rated each team in five categories. Here's how they did it and how the teams ranked in each individual category.
We determined that the most important category is a team's current roster and the future potential of those players -- that category accounts for 50 percent of each NBA team's overall Future Power Rating.
At the same time, we looked at many other factors, such as management, ownership, coaching, a team's spending habits, its cap situation, the reputation of the city and the franchise, and what kind of draft picks we expect the team to have in the future.
Players (50 percent) Players Team Rating 2015 rating 1. Golden State 99.5 95 2. Cleveland 92.5 97.5 3. San Antonio 72.5 82.5 4. Oklahoma City 70 71 5. L.A. Clippers 67 77.5 6. Minnesota 62.5 56.5 7. Utah 60 64 8. Washington 57.5 60 9. Portland 56.5 31 10. Toronto 55.5 44 11. New Orleans 55.5 63 12. Houston 55 69.5 13. Miami 53.5 52.5 14. Indiana 51.5 49 15. Boston 49 35 16. Detroit 48.5 46 17. Atlanta 45 40 18. Chicago 45 61 19. Orlando 42.5 45 20. Denver 42.5 40.5 21. Charlotte 42.5 40 22. Memphis 42.5 45 23. Milwaukee 42 59 24. New York 32.5 27 25. Dallas 31.5 35 26. Sacramento 30 37.5 27. Phoenix 27.5 41 28. Philadelphia 22.5 25 29. L.A. Lakers 20 22.5 30. Brooklyn 10 11.5 Current players and potential for the future
Management (16.7 percent) Management Team Rating 2015 rating 1. Golden State 97 96 1. San Antonio 97 99.5 3. Boston 90 85 4. Miami 77.5 81.5 5. Oklahoma City 72.5 60 5. Portland 72.5 54 7. Dallas 65 72.5 8. Utah 62.5 70 9. Toronto 57.5 54.5 10. Atlanta 55 52.5 11. Cleveland 53 47.5 12. Houston 52.5 65 12. Chicago 52.5 72.5 14. L.A. Clippers 50 47 14. Minnesota 50 20 14. Detroit 50 37.5 17. Indiana 45 50 18. Charlotte 42.5 25 18. Memphis 42.5 56.5 20. Orlando 40 35 20. Milwaukee 40 45.5 20. Philadelphia 40 47.5 23. Washington 35 35 23. Denver 35 27.5 25. New Orleans 32.5 42.5 26. Brooklyn 30 17.5 27. L.A. Lakers 27.5 30 28. New York 20 17.5 28. Phoenix 20 35 30. Sacramento 8 5.5 Quality/stability of front office, ownership, coaching
Money (16.7 percent) Money Team Rating 2015 rating 1. L.A. Lakers 97.5 95 2. Philadelphia 97 99.5 3. Orlando 80 35 4. Boston 70 72.5 5. Brooklyn 67.5 62.5 6. Phoenix 65 50 7. Utah 60 55 8. Washington 60 60 9. Atlanta 57.5 65 10. Indiana 55 55 11. Dallas 52.5 70 11. Minnesota 52.5 50 11. Memphis 52.5 60 14. Miami 50 55 14. Milwaukee 50 52.5 14. Sacramento 50 45 17. Chicago 47.5 52.5 17. Charlotte 47.5 70 19. Portland 45 90 19. Houston 45 42.5 19. Denver 45 45 22. New York 42.5 47.5 23. Detroit 35.5 40 24. New Orleans 35 50 25. Oklahoma City 32.5 37.5 26. Golden State 25 30 27. Toronto 12.5 50 27. L.A. Clippers 12.5 15 29. San Antonio 10 20 30. Cleveland 7.5 12.5 Projected salary-cap situation
Market (8.3 percent) Market Team Rating 2015 rating 1. L.A. Lakers 90 90 1. Miami 90 85 3. New York 87.5 87.5 4. L.A. Clippers 82.5 84 5. Golden State 80 72.5 6. Brooklyn 75 79 7. Cleveland 70 73 8. Houston 67.5 68 9. Phoenix 62.5 59 9. Dallas 62.5 62.5 11. Orlando 55 55 11. Chicago 55 68 13. San Antonio 52.5 47.5 14. Washington 50 57.5 15. Portland 46.5 41.5 16. Boston 45 52.5 17. Denver 42.5 42.5 18. Philadelphia 40 39.5 19. Charlotte 38.5 38.5 20. Atlanta 37.5 37 20. Oklahoma City 37.5 32.5 22. New Orleans 36.5 36.5 23. Indiana 35 35 23. Toronto 35 34.5 25. Memphis 30 30 26. Detroit 25 22.5 27. Minnesota 20 17.5 27. Milwaukee 20 20 29. Utah 18 18 30. Sacramento 10.5 15 Appeal to future acquisitions
Draft (8.3 percent) Draft Team Rating 2015 rating 1. Boston 97.5 91.5 2. Philadelphia 97 97.5 3. Denver 85 90 4. Phoenix 82.5 65 5. Toronto 62.5 75 5. Utah 62.5 47.5 7. Orlando 60 72.5 7. Minnesota 60 75 7. Milwaukee 60 55 10. L.A. Lakers 57.5 42.5 10. Chicago 57.5 51.5 12. Atlanta 52.5 50 13. Charlotte 47.5 50 13. New Orleans 47.5 45 13. Indiana 47.5 50 13. Detroit 47.5 52.5 13. Sacramento 47.5 37.5 18. Portland 45 60 19. Washington 42.5 47.5 20. Dallas 40 45 21. New York 37.5 40 21. Houston 37.5 30 23. San Antonio 32.5 30 23. Oklahoma City 32.5 25.5 23. Memphis 32.5 32.5 26. Miami 30 30 26. L.A. Clippers 30 27.5 28. Golden State 25 22.5 29. Cleveland 22.5 17 30. Brooklyn 15 12.5 Future draft picks; draft positioning